What's the difference?
What's your take on the two positions?
Is it a big deal?
Do you know where you stand on the issue?
Tags:
The single greatest division that exists in Christianity today is arguably between two groups with fundamentally different ways of seeing and reading the Bible.
Traditional/Orthodox Christians: On one side, are traditional/orthodox Christians (often called "Bible-believing Christians" or "Evangelical Christians") who see the Bible as the inerrant and infallible Word of God. They accept the Bible as divine revelation, as God's truth, timeless and universal in its application.
Postmodern Christians: On the other side, are postmodern Christians who aren't so sure that the Bible is a divine product and who doubt whether it's trustworthy and reliable as God's Word. They tend to see the Bible as a collection of stories about an ancient people's understanding of and relationship with God expressed from the point of view of its fallible human writers.
In the end, each of us has to decide what we believe about the origin and authority of the Bible. Is it the Word of God (written by men inspired by the Holy Spirit), or a word (by man) about God?
What's the difference? It's like night and day. When you read a passage from Romans or Ephesians, does that tell us what God says or how the Apostle Paul understood things?
What's your take on the two positions? It has to be an either/or proposition. Either the Bible is divine or human in origin. If it's a little bit of both, then we have a conundrum on our hands. If the Bible is of human origin, that makes it little more than a collection of ancient fairy tales with a nice moral to them.
Is it a big deal? Very much so.
Do you know where you stand on the issue? I believe that the Bible is the Word of God.
Colby,
Well said, and we are in agreement.
I look forward, hoping, to hearing from others in this.
Lord Bless,
LT
It is the words that God, Himself, has given to us for our good (2 Tim. 3:16). No one says that every word is the spoken Word of God, but that the Bible is His Word to mankind. This differentiation is easily understood when we recognize that "Thus saith the Lord" is recorded, therefore not every word is God communicating, but every recorded word is given to us by God for our benefit. It is incumbent upon us to study and to take the time to know who is speaking and to whom they are speaking, among several other things when we try to understand the Scripture in context.
Note also that we refer to the Word of God as God's inspired Word, that which He gave the authors through the Holy Spirit to record for mankind.
God breathed does not mean He spoke the words Satan spoke or the words Job's friends spoke. It means He spoke the words to be recorded to the authors through the Holy Spirit ... divine inspiration and illumination.
Those who attempt to apply God breather the way you have said are simply in error.
I would agree, but leave open the understanding that there are people who come to know God through the sharing of the gospel that do not have access to the Bible (a written copy) and never get the opportunity to seek to discern whether it is the Word of God or a word about God. Theirs in many respects is a simple faith, with simple being used in a positive manner.
At that level I doubt it is much of a consideration either way for them. All they know is that they now (because the Holy Spirit convicted/convinced them) believe in the living Jesus who died for them.
You changed the question. We are talking about what they believe regarding the Bible being God's Word or a word about God.
As far as the parable goes that's pretty simple and true of everyone. If the seed (God's Word) hits good soil it produces fruit and if not it does not.
Regarding doubt, that would be on an individual basis.
Welcome to
All About GOD
© 2024 Created by AllAboutGOD.com. Powered by