So I posted a blog this morning: http://www.allaboutgod.net/profiles/blogs/what-does-sanctification-....
This brings the question we've gone around on many times here. Are we to rebuke satan against everything we endure? Are we to have faith that God does not want us sick or anything else and to stand on that and claim our healing and be healed because of our faith that God heals? Are we to ascribe all sickness and suffering as the work of the devil and that as children of God cannot touch us?
Or are we to allow sanctification to have it's perfect work in us? Sanctification which may come through trials and suffering and sickness that God allows to happen. Satan is the author of it, yet God is in control of everything and not man. For who hath known the mind of the Lord? or who hath been his counsellor? Romans 11:34. I would rather stand on the belief that God wants me healed but that He wants me to shine, to be more like Christ, that He wants my INNER me healed above the outer physical me first than to stand cursing the devil and proclaiming that I'm already healed. I believe in Mark 11:24 wholeheartedly: Therefore I say unto you, What things soever ye desire, when ye pray, believe that ye receive them, and ye shall have them.
And I shall. Maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow. Am I healed? In God's timing, yes I am. And I'm not meaning to start a war on what we believe in, but my point is that God meets each of us where we are. What one may have faith in, they did not acquire overnight. Perhaps they already passed their sanctification point. Perhaps they believe wrongly. Only God knows these things, not I nor anyone else. But I say my faith is strong. I have not quit in spite of it all. But I HAVE BEEN changed....and that concerns God way more than whether my body is healed.
So perhaps we shouldn't be so quick to call down fire from heaven unless and until we know what God is up to?
Tags:
Well our drinking water issue was due to the carelessness of big money corporations. Freedom Inc., a chemical storage facility, who didn't spend the money that was earmarked for tank repairs and allowed the tanks to leak into the river that serviced the water company. The electricity goes out frequently here because of the mountainous region. Along my road is all woods. Power lines are overgrown by trees. Winter storms and high winds take down a lot of trees and power lines. We had around 300,000 without power for over a week at one point last summer when we had tornado force winds here. I use lanterns, a propane heater, bottled water, and keep non-perishable foods on hand.
If you are not careful, you will want to return to the oral traditions of the OT Law. I think Jesus was addressing this when He speaks of straining at a gnat but swallowing a camel.
I think you are probably correct when you say that the mountain here is not literal. However, I must admit that if someone talked beforehand about the Red Sea opening up making a path for the Children of Israel to walk across from Egypt into Arabia, I probably would have thought He was speaking symbolically. Wow! Would I have been wrong. I did mention somewhere in this forum that I did not want to speak presumptuously. God used Moses to speak to that Sea. I believe that Sea literally parted. Yet, we do have to acknowledge the will of God in the parting of the Sea. That was not Moses' idea. This was all God.
Yet, I do believe this Passage in Mark has a symbolical meaning.
As Jesus walked westward that spring morning toward the city of Jerusalem from the town of Bethany, being hungry, He noticed a fig tree in the distant. He saw there were leaves on the tree but no figs. Jesus cursed the fig tree and said, “May no one eat fruit from you again.”
As I have mentioned I believe Jesus is giving us a symbolic message through this incident. The fig tree withered and died never to produce fruit again. There is really some finality to this message. As we have mentioned the fig tree most probably represents the city of Jerusalem and even more in particular. I believe it represents the system of bringing salvation to the world. Jerusalem could have been the center of Christianity. Instead, Jerusalem scorned its Messiah and the wonderful covenant that God was about to give the world.
As Bruce indicated, a fig tree with leaves but no taqsh at this time of year was a sign that this tree would not be producing any fruit that season. The signs were also there that Jerusalem would not be accepting to the Gospel of Christ and that it would no longer be the center for the Word of the Lord going forth. How sad this had to be for the Lord. He wept over the city but the city would no longer be the hub for His Word. Soon, that system would be ended and one that I believe would never again be revived even though some will disagree with that last statement. Some believe a new temple with sacrificial type worship will be reinstituted. I do not. It is over. The tree was dead. Something significantly was about to change in God’s system. The old was finished and about to fade away. The new would come out of another location. But where was that new location to be?
Can you imagine how wonderful it would be if Jerusalem were the center of Christianity in our world today? Would there have been a Roman church? How would it have been for a young ministerial student to have traveled to the most prominent seminary in the world - to the city of Jerusalem? Jesus appears to have wanted that. Jesus cried, "How often, how often," but it was not to be. Jerusalem has suffered greatly as a result of her rejection of the Savior. Two thousand years of desolation coming as a result of Jesus' curse.
This is a beautiful story that I believe Jesus is speaking through this symbolic message. Again, I do not want to be presumptuous. We can feel the sadness of our Savior but yet a joy over His new people. He is rejoicing over us. We received what they rejected. We are warned not to boast in that which was given but for sure encouraged to rejoice. I am sad for Jerusalem but rejoicing that this Gospel was sent to the Gentile nations. You see, I am one of those Gentiles to whom this Gospel has been sent.
I believe we are seeing here a picture of God getting rid of the "old" and sending the "new" to a different location.
I apologize for the length of this post and for using your forum Seek. I had these thoughts swirling in my mind and I wanted to get them on paper. I am just about done. It took longer than I thought.
To some, Mark 11:23-24 is a method to have whatever we want. Other Passages do help us to understand why we don’t get everything we pray for. As I have mentioned, sometimes He does tell us, “No.” What if God did allow us to become little gods that could go around calling things into being? How dangerous could that get?
Have you ever considered how God makes all things work for the good for those that love Him and are called according to His purpose? Sometimes you might have two of these little gods praying and believing for something completely opposite. The only way God can make all things work to the good for His children is for Him to be absolutely sovereign. He has to make tough decisions which sometimes could result in us not getting that which we want or are praying for. When Jesus cursed that fig tree, He could see what was coming. He had understanding that we simply do not have. How many would pray asking God not to do what He did to Jerusalem? God is sovereign.
I am so limited in my thinking and cannot even begin to understand the mind of God. Yet, I do think. When I consider God making all things working for the good of all that belong to Him, I cannot wrap my mind around such a thing.
What we now have is a dead fig tree and the disciple’s amazement of the authority and power of Jesus. Jesus continued, “Have faith in God,” He answered, “If anyone says to this mountain…”
What strikes me in this verse is Jesus referring to a specific mountain. He did not say “a” mountain but “this” mountain. I envision Him pointing to a mountain as He said that. If He were in the plains of Kansas He would have to say “a” mountain as there would be no mountain in sight. However, if He were here in Wyoming, He might very well be pointing to a particular mountain. I think this is the case.
The road from Bethany to Jerusalem most likely crossed over the Mt. of Olives. He certainly went back that way that evening for sure. I’ve never been there but I understand one can get a wonderful view of the city on mountains from the Mount of Olives. Was He referring to a particular mountain or just any mountain? Was He actually pointing to a mountain? I think He was. Nothing else here really makes sense. If so, to which mountain was He pointing?
Jesus was headed west towards Jerusalem. It would have been about a thirty to forty minute journey from Bethany to Jerusalem by foot. The tree would have probably been ahead of Him and He would have undoubtedly been facing this city of hills or mountains as they referred to them just to His west. Which mountain was He seeing? They were headed straight for Mount Moriah or Mount Zion as some refer it to. Jesus was pointing at the Temple mount itself.
As I have mentioned that mountain was the place where the Word of the Lord was to come forth. It was the place of the House of God. God wanted to speak from the holy mountain but the people would not allow it. Jesus told those disciples if they would speak to this mountain and told it to be removed into the sea, it would be done for them. The most prominent important spiritual move in all of history was about to take place and Jesus was there in person as a man speaking to it.
For over three years Jesus had been coming to Jerusalem speaking to them of the great things God was about to do for all mankind. Changes were headed their way and it was about to pass them up. The Jews were resistant to spreading the news that salvation had come and everyone’s sins could all be forgiven. This news would bring fruit to the whole world but it first had to be spread abroad. The system was changing and now all would be included. The Jews said no and Jesus told them that the vineyard would now be leased to others.
That mountain was picked up and thrown but to where was it thrown? Jesus said it would be thrown into the sea. The sea often represents the Gentile nations.
Daniel 7:1-3 The restless sea is a frequent biblical image for the nations of the world (Isa 17:12-13; 57:20; 60:5; Eze 26:3; Rv 13:1; 17:15). (from The Bible Exposition Commentary: Old Testament © 2001-2004 by Warren W. Wiersbe. All rights reserved.)
It is sad but that is exactly what was happening. The Word of the Lord would no longer come out of Jerusalem. Instead the city would become desolate. There would be no more dancing, no more singing, no music from the flutes or the sounds of joy coming from the bride and bridegroom.
Jesus spoke desolation against this city for its refusal to listen first to the prophet John and then the Son Himself. Now the Kingdom would be given to the tax collectors and prostitutes. Even then they would not believe. As spoken by Daniel and confirmed by Jesus, desolation was decreed upon this city and nation. Jesus spoke the sentence:
Lk 19:43-44 3 For the days shall come upon thee, that thine enemies shall cast a trench about thee, and compass thee round, and keep thee in on every side,
44 And shall lay thee even with the ground, and thy children within thee; and they shall not leave in thee one stone upon another; because thou knewest not the time of thy visitation. KJV
And in that very generation, Jerusalem was cast aside as the Kingdom was passed to others. As Jesus said, “Not one stone was left upon another.” The Romans destroyed the city casting every stone down from another in search for gold in the walls.
I am including here a picture of that desolation in AD 70 from the free encyclopedia Wikipedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ercole_de_Roberti_Destruction_of_...
Jesus’ sadness for this event is obvious but the finality and reality of God’s judgment is made very clear to all generations through this desolation. Also, the authentication of the ministry of Christ is made very clear. Why do they still resist their Messiah?
Seek, my next post will be the conclusion. Again, I am sorry for using your forum. But, once I started, I felt I had to complete it. I was primarily getting this down on paper for my sons in their church. Thanks.
Welcome to
All About GOD
© 2024 Created by AllAboutGOD.com. Powered by